MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220994947 · doi:10.34883/pi.2022.13.1.003

Pessimistic Reflections in Women with Nonpsychotic Mental Disorders Aged 40–65 Years

2022· article· ru· W4220994947 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueПсихиатрия психотерапия и клиническая психология · 2022
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Behavioral Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlexithymiaPessimismPsychologyAnxietyToronto Alexithymia ScaleMental healthClinical psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Цель. Изучение клинических и социально-психологических предпосылок возникновения пессимистических размышлений у женщин с непсихотическими психическими расстройствами в возрасте 40–65 лет.Материалы и методы. Проведено сплошное обследование 204 женщин в возрасте 40–65 лет, поступивших в течение года на лечение по поводу непсихотических психических расстройств. При психологическом обследовании использовались Торонтская алекситимическая шкала, Методика измерения уровня тревожности Тейлора; Шкала оценки астении MFI-20; Тест на стрессоустойчивость; Шкала субъективного благополучия.Результаты. Выделены две группы женщин в зависимости от отсутствия (n=118) или наличия (n=86) в течение последнего года разной степени частоты и выраженности пессимистических размышлений, связанных с восприятием себя, своего здоровья, сложившихся отношений в семье и/или на работе, опасениями за будущее, поиском смысла жизни. Женщины с пессимистическими размышлениями отличались более молодым возрастом; более высокими показателями тревожности, алекситимии, менопаузального индекса; низким уровнем стрессоустойчивости и реального субъективного благополучия. У женщин с непсихотическими психическими расстройствами в возрасте 40–65 лет, обнаруживающих пессимистические размышления, можно отметить наличие индикаторов суицидального риска: ситуационные; эмоциональные; когнитивные; реже поведенческие.Заключение. Выявление пессимистических размышлений у женщин, переживающих период возрастных преобразований, необходимо для своевременной их диагностики в структуре психического состояния и оказания психотерапевтической помощи, направленной на превенцию аутодеструктивного поведения и повышение качества жизни. Objective was to study clinical and socio-psychological preconditions for rise of pessimistic reflections in women with nonpsychotic mental disorders aged 40–65 years.Materials and methods. A continuous examination of 204 women aged 40–65 years hospitalized during a year for nonpsychotic mental disorders was conducted. Psychological examination included use of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale, the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale, the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory, Stress Resistance Test, and the Scale of subjective well-being.Results. Two groups of women were distinguished depending on absence (n=118) or presence (n=86) within the last year of pessimistic reflections of various degree of frequency and severity related to oneself, own health, emergent relations in the family and/or at work, apprehension of the future, and search for meaning of life. The women with pessimistic reflections were characterized by younger age; higher indices of anxiety, alexithymia, menopausal index; low level of stress resistance and real subjective well- being. In women with non-psychotic mental disorders aged 40–65 years presenting pessimistic reflections the following indicators of suicide risk may be distinguished: situational; emotional; cognitive; and more seldom behavioral.Conclusions. Identifying the pessimistic reflections in women living through the period of age transformations is necessary for their timely diagnostics in the structure of the female mental health and for the provision of psychotherapeutic care to prevent autodestructive behavior and to heighten the quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it