MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

433 Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Decompression for Migraine: A Systematic Review

2022· review· en· W4220996701 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adnan Shahid, Mehdi Abbasi, Sarosh Irfan Madhani, Jorge A. Larco, Yang Liu, Carrie E. Robertson, Chia‐Chun Chiang, Luis Savastano

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMigraineComplicationVisual analogue scaleSurgeryDecompressionAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Migraine is a common disabling disease with high socioeconomic and personal impacts. Despite various medical options, many patients suffer refractory and chronic migraines. New surgical approaches are gaining traction as viable options to treat migraines. METHODS: The study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. An inclusive search of several databases from January 1990 to December 2nd, 2020, was performed. Studies reporting various decompression approaches of peripheral nerves for chronic or refractory migraines were included and analyzed. The risk of bias of individual studies was assessed in accordance with the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Only those studies representing their data of migraine with mean frequency and intensity of headache, as well as their complication event rate, were reported. RESULTS: Total, 22 studies comprising 1377 patients with migraines were included. Mean age of patients undergoing surgery was 44.22 (95% CI 42.96 - 45.48) years. Patients underwent surgery for migraine comprising decompression of supraorbital, supratrochlear, zygomaticotemporal, or occipital nerve. Most studies reported recovery from headache with improvement in mean headache frequency (range 4.4 to 16.6 days per month) and mean headache intensity (range 2.80 to 7.30 in visual analog scale). The risk of bias was high, with the bias being high in 10 studies and moderate in 11 studies. Total complication rate was 8.0% (95% CI 4.0%-13.0%) which included paresthesia, wound infection, and hypertrophic scarring in a follow-up duration of 2 to 66 months. Heterogeneity in outcome measures and moderate-to-high risk of bias in the majority of studies precluded for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION: Despite improvement in headache frequency and intensity reported on surgical decompression for migraine, available studies reported used variable outcome measures and had moderate-to-high risk of bias.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.012
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207