MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220997695 · doi:10.1177/10775463221078658

Free vibration analyses of functionally graded plates based on improved refined shear and normal deformation theory considering thickness stretching effect using Airy stress function

2022· article· en· W4220997695 on OpenAlexaff
Leila Monajati, Navid Farid, Mehrdad Farid, Hassan Parandvar

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAiry functionDisplacement fieldVibrationPlate theoryTransverse planeShear (geology)Neutral planeMaterials scienceStructural engineeringVibration of platesDisplacement (psychology)BendingMathematical analysisGeometryMechanicsMathematicsPhysicsComposite materialEngineeringFinite element methodAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, an improved refined shear and normal deformation theory is used in order to investigate the vibration behavior of functionally graded rectangular plates. In this theory, displacements of various points of plate are assumed to be due to in-plane displacements of the middle plane and transverse displacement. Transverse displacement is divided into three parts: bending, shear, and thickness stretching. Using the Airy stress function, corresponding to the compatibility equation, and employing the extended Hamilton’s principle, in-plane displacements are omitted from the equations of motions. Thus, the proposed approach uses only three-unknowns in the displacement field. The results of vibration analysis using the proposed approach are in excellent agreement with three-dimensional and quasi-three-dimensional solutions containing a greater number of unknowns to consider the thickness stretching effect. Static and dynamic behavior of wide variety of thin and thick functionally graded plates can be studied using the proposed approach in which not only the number of variables is reduced, but also the contribution of bending, shear, and thickness stretching are completely clarified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207