MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221002666 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-3023

Rock slope dynamics in flysch formation under cold climate (part 1) : rock cracking and failure mechanism

2022· preprint· en· W4221002666 on OpenAlexaffabout
Francis Gauthier, Tom Birien, Francis Meloche

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlyschRockfallGeologyGeotechnical engineeringLandslideCrackingWeatheringUltimate tensile strengthSpallFrost weatheringDifferential stressDeformation (meteorology)GeomorphologySedimentary rockGeochemistryMaterials scienceSoil waterComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rockfalls are major natural hazards for road users and infrastructures in northern Gaspésie (Eastern Canada). In the last 30 years, more than 17 500 rockfalls have reached the two major road servicing the area. Rockfalls come from 10 to 100 m high flysch rockwall conducive to differential weathering. The retreat and settlement of weak rock strata (shale, siltstone) causes the gradual cantilevering of stronger rock strata (sandstone, greywacke), contributing to the development of tension cracks. The block, separated from the cliff, will eventually slide or topple on the eroding rock strata. These dynamics have been observed, but rarely studied with the objective of 1) determining the mechanical stresses and weathering conditions that promote rock cracking and 2) identifying the geometric conditions that control the final failure mode. We use the cantilever beam theory to model critical cantilever length (block size) and rock tensile strength. A frost cracking model (Rempel et al., 2016) was then used to explain the overestimation of the critical cantilever length and to verify whether the development of microfractures caused by frost damage can explain the decrease of the rock tensile strength over time. The results show that the areas of frost damage concentration correspond to those of maximum stress in the overhanging blocks. In order to identify the type of failure of these blocks, tests using a tilting table were carried out in laboratory. 405 tests were performed on 10 blocks characterized by different roughness coefficients and geometric ratios (height / length ratio, overhang length / total length of the block). The results, validated on natural blocks in the field, were used to identify the geometric conditions for stability, sliding, and toppling failure of overhanging block on an inclined plane. Such stability criteria could support the development of rock instability detection algorithm using high resolution 3D model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.107
Threshold uncertainty score0.214

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLandslides and related hazards→French-language works237,207→