Cytomegalovirus lumbosacral polyradiculitis in patients with long-term use of an oral corticosteroid: a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The long-term use of an oral corticosteroid suppresses immunity. Here, we describe a case involving a patient with weakness in the bilateral lower extremities due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) lumbosacral polyradiculitis. CASE PRESENTATION: A 64-year-old man visited a university hospital for symmetric motor weakness in both lower extremities (Medical Research Council grade: 2). Symptoms started 1 month before and gradually aggravated. The patient had been taking oral prednisolone for 10 years in order to control pain in multiple joints due to seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. He also had neuropathic pain on the entire right lower extremity and voiding difficulty. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed enhancement along the entire lumbosacral nerve roots. In the cerebrospinal fluid analysis (CSF), elevated white blood cell (WBC) count (19 cells/μL) and protein level (142.5 mg/dL) were observed. CMV detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was positive. We diagnosed the patient as having lumbosacral polyradiculitis due to CMV. Ganciclovir (250 mg twice daily) was administered intravenously. Two months after initiating Ganciclovir, in the CSF analysis, CM detection by PCR was negative, and no WBC was found. CONCLUSION: We reported a patient who had symmetric motor weakness in the bilateral lower extremities induced by CMV lumbosacral polyradiculitis. Its occurrence seems to be related to immunosuppresion due to the long-term use of an oral corticosteroid. When a patient who is taking an oral corticosteroid shows motor weakness in the bilateral lower extremities, CMV lumbosacral polyradiculitis is one of the possible disorders to be differentiated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".