Potentiation of GABAergic synaptic transmission by diazepam acutely increases resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular events and end-organ damage. However, its underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that a potentiation of GABAergic synaptic transmission by diazepam would acutely increase resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability. In 40 (17 females) young, normotensive subjects, resting beat-to-beat blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography) was continuously measured for 5–10 min, 60 min after the oral administration of either diazepam (10 mg) or placebo. The experiments were conducted in a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled design. Stroke volume was estimated from the blood pressure waveform (ModelFlow) permitting the calculation of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance. Direct recordings of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, microneurography) were obtained in a subset of subjects ( n = 13), and spontaneous cardiac and sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity were calculated. Compared with placebo, diazepam significantly increased the standard deviation of systolic blood pressure (4.7 ± 1.4 vs. 5.7 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 4.5 ± 1.2 mmHg, P = 0.007), and mean blood pressure (3.8 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 1.1 mmHg, P = 0.002), as well as cardiac output (469 ± 149 vs. 626 ± 259 mL/min, P < 0.001) and total peripheral resistance (1.0 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.6 mmHg/L/min, P < 0.001). Similar results were found using different indices of variability. Furthermore, diazepam reduced MSNA (placebo: 22 ± 6 vs. diazepam: 18 ± 8 bursts/min, P = 0.025) without affecting the arterial baroreflex control of heart rate (placebo: 18.6 ± 6.7 vs. diazepam: 18.8 ± 7.0 ms/mmHg, P = 0.87) and MSNA (placebo: −3.6 ± 1.2 vs. diazepam: −3.4 ± 1.5 bursts/100 Hb/mmHg, P = 0.55). Importantly, these findings were not impacted by biological sex. We conclude that GABA A receptors modulate resting beat-to-beat blood pressure variability in young adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".