MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221037108 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29202-x

Guide RNAs containing universal bases enable Cas9/Cas12a recognition of polymorphic sequences

2022· article· en· W4221037108 on OpenAlexafffund
Amanda R. Krysler, Christopher R. Cromwell, Tommy Tu, Juan Jovel, Basil P. Hubbard

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSeoul National UniversityGovernment of Canada
KeywordsCRISPRComputational biologyCas9BiologyGuide RNAGeneticsGeneGenome editing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CRISPR/Cas complexes enable precise gene editing in a wide variety of organisms. While the rigid identification of DNA sequences by these systems minimizes the potential for off-target effects, it consequently poses a problem for the recognition of sequences containing naturally occurring polymorphisms. The presence of genetic variance such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a gene sequence can compromise the on-target activity of CRISPR systems. Thus, when attempting to target multiple variants of a human gene, or evolved variants of a pathogen gene using a single guide RNA, more flexibility is desirable. Here, we demonstrate that Cas9 can tolerate the inclusion of universal bases in individual guide RNAs, enabling simultaneous targeting of polymorphic sequences. Crucially, we find that specificity is selectively degenerate at the site of universal base incorporation, and remains otherwise preserved. We demonstrate the applicability of this technology to targeting multiple naturally occurring human SNPs with individual guide RNAs and to the design of Cas12a/Cpf1-based DETECTR probes capable of identifying multiple evolved variants of the HIV protease gene. Our findings extend the targeting capabilities of CRISPR/Cas systems beyond their canonical spacer sequences and highlight a use of natural and synthetic universal bases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207