MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Synchronized Boost Converter for Low Power Photo Voltaic Harvesting with Practical Design Considerations

2022· article· en· W4221038393 on OpenAlexaff
Maziar Rastmanesh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemVoltageElectronic engineeringPower (physics)Maximum power point trackingElectrical impedanceComputer scienceLow voltageEnergy conversion efficiencyElectrical efficiencyConstant power circuitSwitched-mode power supplyElectrical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this research is to address low power photovoltaic (PV) harvesting issues and to develop a new power loss reduction methodology to improve the efficiency and output voltage concurrently. The output impedance of a PV is non-constant, and it changes in a nonlinear fashion which makes it a challenge to match the load to the PV cell impedance for efficiency regulation. Equally important is to avoid decreasing the output voltage of the module during an overcast. This creates a challenge to ensure a maximum power transfer and hence, degrades the efficiency. This paper presents a systematic approach to develop more efficient solar power conversion topologies to improve the output power, efficiency, output voltage and voltage conversion efficiency concurrently with a negligible impact on the reliability in Continuous Current Mode (CCM). To verify and validate the analysis and theory of the proposed topology, four prototypes were tested experimentally. The proposed circuit and approach outperform the current low power harvesting in terms of efficiency (83.1%) and output voltage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207