MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221040467 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-10294

An advanced coupled modelling system to study interactions among the circulation, sea ice, and biogeochemistry in the Northwest Atlantic Ocean

2022· preprint· en· W4221040467 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kyoko Ohashi, Arnaud Laurent, Christoph Renkl, Fehmi Dilmahamod, Shengmu Yang, Katja Fennel, Eric C. J. Oliver, Jinyu Sheng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOceanographySea iceBiogeochemistryOcean currentClimatologyGeologyClimate modelBiogeochemical cycleBoundary currentPhysical oceanographyEnvironmental scienceClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northwest Atlantic (NWA) plays a critical role in the global ocean circulation and regulates the global climate system through meridional transport in western boundary currents as well as through deep convection. Global climate change is projected to significantly impact ocean circulation, vertical mixing, and sea ice dynamics in the NWA, with important implications for the area’s biological productivity and carbon export. These physical and biological features and their variabilities are challenging to numerical ocean models and often poorly represented in global climate models. This creates a difficulty in projecting future changes in nutrient dynamics, production, and carbon export. To address these challenges we have developed an advanced coupled circulation-sea ice-biogeochemistry modelling system for the NWA. This modelling system is based on the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS), the Community Sea Ice Model (CICE), and a biogeochemical model including oxygen dynamics and carbon chemistry. The model domain spans the area from Cape Hatteras to Baffin Bay and from the east coast of North America to the central North Atlantic, with the horizontal grid resolution ranging from ~8 km in the south to ~2 km in the north. The circulation and sea ice models are forced by atmospheric and oceanic reanalysis data at the surface and lateral boundaries, respectively. The circulation model is additionally forced by tides, river discharge, and continental runoff. Preliminary model results are presented and compared to various types of observations, with a focus over coastal waters and the deep convection region of the Labrador Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→