Secular change in the age of TTG sources during the Archean from in-situ Sr and Hf isotope analysis by LA-MC-ICPMS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Much of the continental lithosphere developed during the Archean, which was an Eon of change in terms of global geodynamics and geochemical cycles. Uncovering the causal links between crust forming processes and prevailing geodynamic mechanisms is crucial for understanding the origins and composition of the present-day continental lithosphere. Pristine Archean crust is scarce yet can be found in cratons worldwide. Many of these occurrences comprise rocks of the tonalite-trondhjemite-granodiorite (TTG) suite, which represent a prevalent component of the Archean continental crust. TTGs are generally considered to have formed by partial melting of amphibolite or eclogite source rocks that had basaltic precursors originally extracted from a depleted mantle (e.g., [1]). The age of the source rocks (i.e., the time between the basalt extraction from the mantle and TTG formation) can be determined from the initial radiogenic isotope compositions of TTGs, provided that the P/D ratio of the source can be reliably estimated and is significantly different from that of the depleted mantle. Based on this principle, we estimated the age of basaltic sources of TTGs from cratons of different age and paleogeography from initial 87Sr/86Sr compositions determined by in-situ Sr isotope analysis of primary igneous apatite (LA-MC-ICPMS). The 87Sr/86Sr of these apatites show that prior to 3.4 Ga TTGs were derived from relatively old mafic sources and that the average time between formation of basaltic material from the mantle and subsequent remelting under amphibolite to eclogite facies conditions decreased drastically during the Paleoarchean. This secular change indicates a rapid global increase in the efficiency of TTG production or the emergence of a new TTG-forming process at c. 3.4 Ga [2]. In this contribution we explore this hypothesis by comparing the 87Sr/86Sr signature of the TTGs with their trace-element compositions, as well as with 176Hf/177Hf zircon data for these rocks and contemporary TTGs from other studies. This combined geochronological, isotope and geochemical analyses will provide new constraints on the age of TTG sources during the Archean and will allow investigation into the nature and probable causes of the apparent rejuvenation at 3.4 Ga, as indicated by Sr isotopes. [1] Hoffmann, J.E. et al. (2011) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 4157-4178. [2] Caton, S., et al., (in review) Chem. Geol.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".