MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221047283 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irac012.347

797 Single Stage Application of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension in Deep Partial Thickness Pediatric Facial Burns

2022· article· en· W4221047283 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Lou, Anjay Khandelwal, Beverly Beaucock

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermabrasionSurgerySkin graftingBurn injuryFibrous joint

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Deep partial thickness facial burns in the pediatric population present a dilemma. Standard burn treatment includes excision and split thickness sheet grafting for the face or closure which often yield sub-optimal results. Point-of-care system for autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be utilized as a stand alone option for partial thickness burns. We sought to evaluate our early results from the treatment of pediatric deep partial thickness facial burns using ASCS. Methods This was a retrospective cohort analysis of pediatric deep partial thickness facial burns treated with early excision and application of ASCS. After assessment by two surgeons, patients underwent tangential excision with either standard surgical burn knives or dermabrasion. Depth was assessed and if dermal elements were present, then ASCS was applied. Primary outcome was time to >95% reepithelialization, and secondary outcomes were aesthetics, Vancouver Scar Scale, postoperative complications, number of reoperations for wound closure, and need for burn reconstruction. Results From September 2020 to July 2021, eight pediatric patients (six male and two female) with deep partial thickness facial burns were treated within one week of injury with excision and ASCS. TBSA ranged from 0.3%-24% with some having additional anatomic areas. The mean age was 2.5 years old, with a range of 1.08-5.0 years old. Burn mechanisms included flame, scald, and contact. The mean time from burn injury to initial excision and ASCS was 4.3 days, with a range of 2-7 days. Average time to complete reepithelialization was 20.3 days, with a range of 4-47 days. Average follow up duration was 218 days with a range of 98-365 days. No patients experienced complete graft loss or infection. One patient required need for reoperation with reapplication of polylactic acid skin substitute placed to a small area on the face during closure for other non-face burns. Of the 8 patients, the two patients with the longest times to complete reepithelialization required laser therapy, of which one patient also needed limited facial scar contracture release. Conclusions Early, single-staged ASCS application results in good aesthetic and relatively quick healing times with no complications and limited need for additional burn reconstruction. While the results are promising, there is a need for larger studies with longer term follow up before wider applicability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207