MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221049669 · doi:10.1002/pmrj.12809

The effect of axillary crutch length on upper limb kinematics during swing‐through gait

2022· article· en· W4221049669 on OpenAlexafffund
Gregor Kuntze, Monica Russell, Shaine Jivan, Janet L. Ronsky, Ranita Harpreet Kaur Manocha

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsCrutchKinematicsMedicineRange of motionGaitElbowPhysical medicine and rehabilitationScapulaBiomechanicsPhysical therapyAnatomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Axillary crutches are commonly used in rehabilitation. Inappropriately fit crutches may result in upper limb pain or injury. Objective To investigate the effects of axillary crutch length on upper limb kinematics to better understand potential injury mechanisms. It was hypothesized that crutches that were longer or shorter than standard‐fit crutches would alter upper limb kinematics. Design Cross‐sectional. Setting Gait laboratory. Participants Fifteen healthy males with no prior crutch experience. Interventions Participants were fit with axillary crutches using standardized methods, as well as with crutches that were 5 cm longer and 5 cm shorter. Participants performed swing‐through gait (1.20 ± 0.07 ms −1 ) with all crutch lengths in randomized order. Kinematics were recorded using an optical motion‐tracking system and joint angles for the scapula, shoulder, elbow, and wrist were computed. Main Outcome Measures The effects of crutch length on joint range of motion (ROM) and joint angles at initial crutch contact were analyzed using multivariate analysis (Hotelling's T 2 ; α = .025) and simultaneous confidence intervals (CI). Results The long‐standard crutch fit comparison showed effects across all joints (ROM p = .009; initial contact p < .001). Longer crutches resulted in greater scapular upward rotation (mean difference [95% CI] ROM: 1.0 [−0.2 to 2.2]; initial contact: −2.7 [−4.4, −1.1]) and shoulder abduction (ROM: 0.8 [−0.1 to 1.8]; initial contact: −1.9 [−4.1 to 0.3]). Crutch length also had effects across all joints for the short‐standard fit comparison (ROM p = .004; initial contact p = .016). Shorter crutches resulted in greater scapula downward rotation (2.2 [−0.4 to 4.8]) and greater shoulder adduction (2.5 [−0.6 to 5.6]) at initial contact. Shorter crutches also reduced shoulder flexion/extension ROM (−2.5 [−4.4 to −0.6]). Conclusions Altered crutch length results in scapular and shoulder kinematic deviations that may present risk factors for upper limb injury with crutch‐walking. This may underline the importance of appropriate device fitting to reduce injury risk in crutch users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.748
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePM&RSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207