587 Ambient temperatures in the burn operating room: A QI initiative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Patients with burn injuries are particularly susceptible to perioperative hypothermia, which is associated with a range of complications, including infection, bleeding and delayed wound healing. Raising the operating room (OR) ambient temperature is an important strategy to prevent hypothermia, but we were uncertain about how strictly we do this. The purpose of this study was to determine the ambient OR temperatures during acute burn surgery as the first step of a quality improvement initiative to ensure we are maintaining a warm OR environment. Methods Between 1/3/2020 and 28/2/2021, ambient temperatures during surgery in the burn OR of an ABA-verified burn center were recorded every 15 minutes. Temperatures were measured using a wall-mounted smart sensor, transmitted to a mobile smartphone application via Bluetooth. All patients undergoing acute burn excision and closure procedures lasting > 2 hours were included in the study. Hypothermia was defined as a core temperature < 36°C. Results Of the 119 patients, the majority were male (n=86; 72.3%), the mean age was 49.8 years (range 18-89) and the mean total body surface area (TBSA) was 15.8% (range 1-62%). They underwent 261 operations (mean 2.2 cases per patient; range 1-15) with a mean duration of 211.1 minutes (range 120-468 minutes). Sixty-two patients underwent 1 surgery, and 31 had 2 surgeries. Eight patients (6.7%) died. Thirty-three patients (27.7%) were hypothermic at the end of 43 cases (16.5%). The mean ambient temperature was 24.8oC (range 18.7oC to 29.6oC). Hypothermic patients (n= 33 patients, 43 cases), did not differ significantly in age or operative duration from non- hypothermic patients (n= 86 patients, 218 cases) but did have significantly larger %TBSA burns [32.3 vs 24.8 (p= 0.02)]. Hypothermic cases experienced significantly lower ambient temperatures at the start of surgery (p=0.007), and mean temperature during surgery (p=0.009), and tended to experience a lower ambient temperature at the end of surgery (24.5 C vs 25.1 °C , p= 0.06). [Table] Conclusions We have identified that the ambient temperature in our burn OR is lower than desirable and that this is directly related to development of hypothermia. These results now indicate that a QI intervention (stricter attention and manoeuvers to ensuring a warm operating room at the start and during surgery) is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".