MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221068575 · doi:10.1007/s10856-022-06653-8

Three-dimensional printing of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite bone tissue engineering scaffolds mechanical properties and biological behavior

2022· article· en· W4221068575 on OpenAlex
Naghme Rezania, Mitra Asadi‐Eydivand, Nabiollah Abolfathi, Shahin Bonakdar, Morteza Mehrjoo, Mehran Solati‐Hashjin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycaprolactoneSimulated body fluidScaffoldMaterials scienceBiocompatibilityBiomedical engineeringTissue engineeringCompressive strengthComposite materialScanning electron microscopePolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Controlled pore size and desirable internal architecture of bone scaffolds play a significant role in bone regeneration efficiency. In addition to choosing appropriate materials, the manufacturing method is another significant factor in fabricating the ideal scaffold. In this study, scaffolds were designed and fabricated by the fused filament fabrication (FFF) technique. Polycaprolactone (PCL) and composites films with various percentages of hydroxyapatite (HA) (up to 20%wt) were used to fabricate filaments. The influence of (HA) addition on the mechanical properties of filaments and scaffolds was investigated. in vitro biological evaluation was examined as well as the apatite formation in simulated body fluid (SBF). The addition of HA particles increased the compressive strength and Young's modulus of filaments and consequently the scaffolds. Compared to PCL, Young's modulus of PCL/HA20% filament and three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold has increased by 30% and 50%, respectively. Also, Young's modulus for all scaffolds was in the range of 30-70 MPa, which is appropriate to use in spongy bone. Besides, the MTT assay was utilized to evaluate cell viability on the scaffolds. All the samples had qualified cytocompatibility, and it would be anticipated that addition of HA particles raise the biocompatibility in vivo. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) evaluation shows that the addition of HA caused higher ALP activity in the PCL/HA scaffolds than PCL. Furthermore, calcium deposition in the PCL/HA specimens is higher than control. In conclusion, the addition of HA particles into the PCL matrix, as well as utilizing an inexpensive commercial FFF device, lead to the fabrication of scaffolds with proper mechanical and biological properties for bone tissue engineering applications. Graphical abstract.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it