MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221074916 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13881

New insights into the drivers of moss‐associated nitrogen fixation and cyanobacterial biomass in the eastern Canadian boreal forest

2022· article· en· W4221074916 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Marie Renaudin, Charlotte Blasi, Robert L. Bradley, Jean‐Philippe Bellenger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMossNitrogen fixationBiomass (ecology)EcologyBiologyBorealCyanobacteriaEcosystemTaigaAgronomyNutrientEnvironmental scienceBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Moss‐associated cyanobacteria nitrogen (N 2 ‐) fixation can contribute to support moss growth and constitutes a major source of new N in boreal forest ecosystems. The biomass of moss‐colonizing cyanobacteria and their N 2 ‐fixation are usually considered linearly correlated. Yet, recent evidence has shown that cyanobacterial biomass and N 2 ‐fixation can be decoupled, suggesting that they are not necessary affected by the same environmental and ecological drivers. Climate and nutrients were reported as affecting moss‐associated N 2 ‐fixation, with equivocal results, whereas drivers of moss cyanobacterial biomass remain unclear. In addition, these drivers are often determined through manipulative experiments (e.g. fertilization and incubation) and remain to be validated with complementary observational studies to help us better understand future impacts of global change on the moss–cyanobacteria symbiosis. We hypothesized that moss‐associated cyanobacterial biomass is controlled in situ by factors affecting bacterial growth, whereas N 2 ‐fixation is controlled by factors affecting enzymatic reactions. Using random forests, Spearman correlations and linear mixed‐effects models, we determined the main drivers of cyanobacterial biomass and N 2 ‐fixation of two feather moss species, which were collected over 3 years along a 1000‐km latitudinal transect in the eastern Canadian boreal forest. We found that temperature, precipitation and phosphorus were the main positive drivers of moss cyanobacterial biomass and that temperature and molybdenum were the main positive drivers of N 2 ‐fixation. Vanadium was a negative driver of N 2 ‐fixation, suggesting the use of alternative nitrogenases by cyanobacteria. Both cyanobacterial biomass and N 2 ‐fixation were strongly influenced by the moss species and were negatively correlated with moss C:N stoichiometry, highlighting the role of N 2 ‐fixation in moss N enrichment. Synthesis . We identified for the first time some environmental drivers of moss‐associated cyanobacterial biomass and showed that they contrast with the drivers of N 2 ‐fixation, which should be considered in further research and confirmed in other experimental settings. This is an important advance in our knowledge of moss–cyanobacteria associations, which would greatly help in better predicting the impacts of global change on this symbiosis and on nitrogen inputs in boreal forest ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcologySame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207