Adaptive dual-energy algorithm based on pre-calibrated weighting factors for chest radiography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. To develop a dual-energy (DE) algorithm with spatially varying weighting factors for material selection and noise suppression. Approach. Calibration step-phantoms, with overlapping slabs of solid water and bone with different thicknesses, were used to obtain the pre-calibrated material selection and noise reduction weighting factors. The Material selection weighting factors were calculated by finding a zero of contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) between regions with two overlapping materials and regions of only target material, while noise suppression weighting factors were determined by maximizing signal-to-noise ratio for overlapping regions. The pre-calibrated weighting factors were fitted with low and high energy radiograph of two Rando phantoms to create maps of material selection and noise suppression weighting factors, which used with DE algorithm and anti-correlated noise reduction (ACNR) algorithm to generate DE images. Three different implementations, including two different sizes of Rando phantoms and two different orientations (oblique and anterior-posterior), were investigated. Soft-tissue and bone only images of Rando phantoms were obtained with five combinations of DE algorithms and CNR, contrast, and noise values of selected regions of interest were compared to evaluate the performance of the novel method: simple log subtraction (SLS), SLS with uniform ACNR, adaptive DE (aDE), aDE with uniform ACNR, and aDE and adaptive ACNR (aACNR). Main results. Compared to SLS, the aDE algorithm demonstrated improved image quality in all three orientations. CNR increased with better contrast for both soft-tissue and bone images. Implementation of aACNR algorithm resulted in further reduction of image noise and improvements in CNR at the cost of contrast. However, aACNR algorithm showed better contrast compared to ACNR method. Significance. A novel DE algorithm was proposed, which showed improved material selection and noise suppression as compared to the conventional DE techniques and can be easily implemented in a clinical environment for real-time DE image generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".