MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221083835 · doi:10.1002/adma.202200077

An Ultrafast, Durable, and High‐Loading Polymer Anode for Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Batteries and Supercapacitors

2022· article· en· W4221083835 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhixiao Xu, Matthew Li, Wenyuan Sun, Tian Tang, Jun Lü, Xiaolei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryOffice of Energy EfficiencyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyOffice of ScienceVehicle Technologies OfficeUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Chicago
KeywordsAnodeMaterials scienceElectrolyteFaraday efficiencyPolymerCathodeAqueous solutionSupercapacitorChemical engineeringBattery (electricity)ElectrodeCapacitanceComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Zn metal has shown promise as an anode material for grid‐level energy storage, yet is challenged by dendritic growth and low Coulombic efficiency. Herein, an ultrafast, stable, and high‐loading polymer anode for aqueous Zn‐ion batteries and capacitors (ZIBs and ZICs) is developed by engineering both the electrode and electrolyte. The anode polymer is rationally prepared to have a suitable electronic structure and a large π‐conjugated structure, whereas the electrolyte is manufactured based on the superiority of triflate anions over sulfate anions, as analyzed and confirmed via experiments and simulations. This dual engineering results in an optimal polymer anode with a low discharge potential, near‐theoretical capacity, ultrahigh‐loading capability (≈50 mg cm−2), ultrafast rate (100 A g−1), and ultralong lifespan (one million cycles). Its mechanism involves reversible Zn2+/proton co‐storage at the carbonyl site. When the polymer anode is coupled with cathodes for both ZIB and ZIC applications, the devices demonstrate ultrahigh power densities and ultralong lifespans, far surpassing those of corresponding Zn‐metal‐based devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations160
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced MaterialsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207