MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221090337 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-35.1.72

Explanation of the velocity of the stars in the galaxies in the dynamic medium of reference (DMR) theory

2022· article· en· W4221090337 on OpenAlex
Olivier Pignard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRelativity and Gravitational Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGravitationGalaxyStarsAstrophysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The theory of the dynamic medium of reference (DMR) has already been presented in several articles, in particular: “Dynamic medium of reference: A new theory of gravitation” [O. Pignard, Phys. Essays 32 , 422 (2019)]. The article “Theory of the dynamic medium of reference: Exterior case and interior case” [O. Pignard, Phys. Essays 34 , 280 (2021)] gives an explanation and mathematical developments of the gravitational acceleration from atomic nuclei of a massive body. The objective of this article is to explain the velocity of the stars in galaxies within the framework of the DMR theory. The DMR theory proposes to modify the law of gravitation at long distance. The demonstration allowing to obtain the gravitational acceleration makes it possible to establish that: the gravitational acceleration generated by a massive body of mass M one of whose dimensions is much smaller than the other two becomes <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> for distances greater than a certain limit distance R L from the massive body, and the gravitational acceleration generated by a massive body of mass M of spherical shape (a star, for example) becomes <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> for distances greater than a certain limit distance R L from the massive body. The first law of gravitation at long-distance <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:math> makes it possible to explain a constant star rotation curve from a certain distance from the center of the galaxy. Among 126 galaxies analyzed, this corresponds to the profile of 76 galaxies. For this, it is assumed the existence of dark matter located in the center of the galaxy in the form of a flat disk of thickness much less than its diameter. For rotating stars in this type of galaxy, this causes that beyond the distance R L from the center of the galaxy, the velocity of the stars becomes constant and equals to <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:msqrt> </mml:math> . The dark matter required by the DMR theory has a mass that is only about 30% that of ordinary matter in a galaxy (stars and interstellar gas) instead of the immense quantities required by current theories. The second law of gravitation at long-distance <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>γ</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>G</mml:mi> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>R</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>L</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> makes it possible to explain an increasing star rotation curve. Among 126 galaxies analyzed, this corresponds to the profile of 50 galaxies. For this type of galaxy, it is not necessary to assume the existence of dark matter, and all the stars contained in the galaxy are sufficient to explain the star rotation curve. For this type of galaxy, the velocity of the stars increases approximately in proportion to <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:msqrt> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:msqrt> </mml:math> . Finally, the modifications of the law of gravitation proposed by the DMR theory would also explain the observed values of the deflection of light rays by galaxies (Einstein lenses and rings), which the modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) theory cannot do.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it