The relationship between a numbers of administrative instructions in implementation the process of reducing employees
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 1992, KRG-IRAQ has been established to governing the northern region of Iraq (Kurdistan), with small number of employees and moderate governmental administrations. However, with passing of time this statues changed, especially after 2004, as new central Iraqi government great budget effluent for KRG-IRAQ, that drags with itself recruitment of hundreds thousands of officials. Then, in 2014, political conflicts occurred between central government of Iraq and KRG-Iraq and together with terrorist organization of ISIS war and crude oil price depression makes KRG-IRAQ not be able to pay full monthly employee's salary. This research tries to introduce a guideline for government rightsizing through using of three administrative regulations of; (Reduced work week), Job sharing and Early retirement. A quantitative research methodology has been chose to analyze a specimen of governmental high officers' opinion through questionnaire approach to know how these 3 independent variables effects rightsizing as dependent variable. A questionnaire form created after making case study interview and checking both validity and reliability, three hypotheses were been estimated (H1, H2 and H3). Data analyzed after checking the reliability through frequency and correlation (Bivariate analyses method), the results show high significant correlation of all three administration regulation with the possibility of rightsizing implementation for KRG-Iraq's employees. Reference: Andy field. (2005) Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, fourth edition. 4th edn. London: SAGE Publications. Alchemer (2021) Collecting Personal Information with Surveys Should Be Handled Delicately. [Online]. Available at: https://www.alchemer.com/resources/blog/how-to-collect-personal-information-with-surveys/, (Accessed: 26 Sep 2021). Akhunov eta el. (2006) Employees trust in managers in a downsized organization. KRISTIANSTAD UNIVERSITY, pp. 60. By Bart L. Weathington, Christopher J. L. Cunningham, David J. Pittenger (2012) Understanding Business Research, A JOHN WILY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION. Beata Megyesi. (2002) Data Driven Syntactic Analysis Methods and application for Swedish. Dissertation. KTH University. Cecil A. Clabaugh. (2001) Downsizing: an analysis of organizational strategies and human resource management outcomes. Edith Cowan University, pp. 291-292. Husam Aldeen Mustafa Al-Khadash. (2015) COSO Enterprise Risk Management Implementation in Jordanian Commercial Banks and its Impact on Financial Performance [Online] Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication (Accessed: 1 Oct 2021). L. Morrow Jr., Richard A. Johnson, Lowell W. Busenitz. (2004) The Effects of Cost and Asset Retrenchment on the Firm Performance, Journal of management, 30 (2), pp. 189-208. Kim S. Cameron, Sarah J. Freeman, and Aneil K. Mishra. (1993) Downsizing and Redesigning Organizations, academia.edu. Kurdistan Regional Government. (2021) Kurdistan Regional Government. [Online]. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurdistan_Regional_Government (Accessed on 15 Dec 2021). Kurdistan Regional Government (2021) Government Entities. [Online]. Available at: www.gov.krd (Accessed: 20 May 2021). Kuder, G.F., Richardson, M.W. (1937) the theory of the estimation of test reliability, Psychometrika, 2 (3), pp.151–160. Lee J. Coronbach. (1951) Coefficient of Alpha and Internal Structure of Test, Psychometrika, 16(3) Manfred, F. R. Kets de Vries and Katharina Balazs. (1997) The Downside of Downsizing, Human relation Vol. 50, No 1. Ozlem Ozkanli, Mete Bumin. (2006) the relationship between downsizing and financial performance of Turkish banks, Banks and Bank system, (1)3. Pallavi Chopade. (2012) An Impact of Rightsizing on Existing Employee’s Commitment and Morale: Study of Indian Companies, International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 1(2), pp.6-10. Qualtrics (2022) Determining sample size: how to make sure you get the correct sample size. [Online]. Available at: https://www.qualtrics.com/experience-management/research/determine-sample-size/ (Accessed: 27 Jan 2022). QuestionPro- a (2021) Quantitative Research: Definition, Methods, Types and Examples. [Online]. Available at: https://www.questionpro.com/blog/quantitative-research/ (Accessed: 6 Sep 2020). QuestionPro-b (2021) Correlation analysis. [Online]. Available at: https://www.questionpro.com/blog/quantitative-research/ (Accessed: 5 Nov 2021). SmartSurvey (2021) Likert Scale Questions. [Online]. Available at: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/survey-questions/likert-scale (Accessed: 15 April 2021) Statistical analysis (2021) Sample Size Table. [Online]. Available at: https://www.research-advisors.com/tools.php (Accessed: 10 June 2021). Statistics Solutions (2021) Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient [Online]. Available at: https://www.statisticssolutions.com/free-resources/directory-of-statistical-analyses/pearsons-correlation-coefficient/ (Accessed: 8 June 2021). The Jordan times (2020) Royal Jordanian Airlines readies for staff cuts, offers incentives for ‘voluntary dismissal. Feb 09. Thomas D. Lynch, Peter L. Vruise. (1999) Can The Public Sector Leviathan Be Reformed? Rightsizing Possibilities for the Twenty-First Century, M@n@gement, 2(3). Thomas K. Tiemann, Mohammad Mahbobi, (2010) Introductory Business Statistics with Interactive Spreadsheets 1st Canadian Edition. [Online] Available at: http://open.bccampus.ca (Accessed: 30 Sep 2021). Typeform (2021) Likert scale surveys: what are they and why should you use them? [Online]. Available at: https://www.typeform.com/surveys/likert-scale-questionnaires/ (Accessed: 10 May 2021). USC Libraries (2021) Research Guide [Online]. Available at: https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/variables (Accessed: 10 June 2021). Wayne Goddard, Stuart Melville. (2001) Research Methodology an Introduction, second edition. Juta and Company Ltd. William McKinley., Carol M. Sanchez. and Allen G. Schick. (1995) Organizational Downsizing: Constraining, Cloning, and Learning, Academy of management executives, 9(3), pp.33-44. Word bank group (2016) Kurdistan region of Iraq, reforming the economy for shared prosperity and protecting the vulnerable. Word bank, IFC. Zakira Sayed. (2013) the Impact of Downsizing on the Remaining Employees in the Organization. Master Baccalaureus in Commerce. University of the Westren Cape.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".