Multiple partial melts trapped in garnets from the Adirondacks lower crust: clues for TTG formation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Adirondack Mountains, New York State, USA belongs to the Canadian Grenville Province (Darling and Peck, 2016). The rocks exposed in the Adirondacks are interpreted to be the lower plate of a thrust-system at crustal levels during the Ottawan Orogeny (1090-1050 Ma) of the Grenvillian orogenic cycle. Garnet is abundant throughout the Adirondacks, with the greatest occurrence of megacrystic garnets within central Highlands. In the Gore Mountain area, the Hooper Mine is located 5 kilometers northwest of the Barton Mine and consists of partially melted mafic granulite. The mineral assemblage consists of medium grain size plagioclase, green hornblende and garnet in proportion 60:20:20. We separated the garnets of the Hooper Mine in two categories according to their size, chemical zoning and habitus: (1) Large, euhedral garnet porphyroblasts of diameter > 5 cm (LG), and (2) and small, xenoblastic grains (SG). Both types of garnets contain quartz, rutile and melt inclusions, similar to those observed in Barton Mine (Ferrero et al., 2021). In LG, chemical zoning is weak and inclusions are scattered randomly within the mineral. In SG, zoning coincides with the presence of quartz and melt inclusions in domain of low Ca and Y. Ti-in-quartz and Ti-in-amphibole thermometers in SG give equilibrium temperatures of 800-900 °C at 10 kbar. Major and trace element analyses on rehomogenised melt inclusions in both types of garnet indicate two types of melts are present in the migmatite – granitic melt in SG and trondhjemitic melt in LG. Stable isotope ratios of oxygen and hydrogen in hornblende (δ2H: -62 to -73 0/00 and δ18O: 4.7 to 6.7 0/00) indicate that partial melting occurs in a closed isotopic system and records the primary magmatic δ2H signature of the protolith. The range of melt chemistries, combined with the information previously collected in the Barton Mine defines a trend characteristic of primitive TTG melts or TTG embryos. These melts, combined with different proportion of peritectic phases (i.e. garnet, plagioclase and quartz), reproduces the full TTG chemistry range (Moyen, 2011). Therefore, the Mesoproterozoic mafic lower crust might be a perfect laboratory to test early granitoids genesis processes and better understand the link between melt inclusions, plate tectonics and the formation of the continental crust (Nicoli & Ferrero, 2021). References: Ferrero, S. et al. (2021). Embryos of TTGs in Gore Mountain garnet megacrysts from water-fluxed melting of the lower crust. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 569, 117058. Darling, R. S. and Peck W.H. (2016). Metamorphic conditions of Adirondack rocks. Adirondack Journal of Environmental Studies, 21(1), 7. Moyen, J. F. (2011). The composite Archaean grey gneisses: petrological significance, and evidence for a non-unique tectonic setting for Archaean crustal growth. Lithos, 123(1-4), 21-36. Nicoli, G., & Ferrero, S. (2021). Nanorocks, volatiles and plate tectonics. Geoscience Frontiers, 12(5), 101188.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".