An Immunoglobulin A Vasculitis Case Without Skin Symptoms Complicated With Severe Abdominal Symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV) primarily affects childhood and can be categorized as immune complex vasculitis. It typically presents with purpura, abdominal pain, arthritis, and nephritis. IgAV can be diagnosed without hesitation when the characteristic skin lesions appear at onset; however, in cases where the abdominal symptoms precede the skin rash or there is no purpura at all, diagnosis can be challenging. Delayed diagnosis of IgAV may be associated with serious abdominal complications, such as gastrointestinal perforation. Here, we describe a girl with IgAV complicated with severe abdominal symptoms and lacking purpura. Despite this lack, the patient's elevated levels of D-dimer and C-reactive protein (CRP), suggestive of vasculitis, and localized small bowel intestinal wall thickening suggested IgAV. After administration of steroids relieved the abdominal symptoms and hypoalbuminemia, treatment was discontinued. Given the limited reports of patients with IgAV complicated with severe abdominal symptoms and no skin symptoms, the diagnosis and management process remains unclear. Therefore, it is imperative to consider IgAV as a differential diagnosis in patients with severe abdominal symptoms. Furthermore, we suggest checking D-dimer, CRP, and coagulation factor XIII activity levels in these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".