MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Oleiharenicola</i>

2022· other· en· W4221116496 on OpenAlexaff
Fauziah F. Rochman, Triet Tran, Peter F. Dunfield

Bibliographic record

VenueBergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacteriaGenus16S ribosomal RNABotanyBiologyChemistryFood sciencePaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract O.le.i.ha.re.ni ' co.la. L. neut. n. oleum , oil; L. fem. n. harena , sand; L. suffix ‐ cola , inhabitant, dweller; N.L. masc. n. Oleiharenicola defines an inhabitant of oil sands wastewater. The genus Oleiharenicola consists of two described species of strictly aerobic chemoorganotrophic bacteria: Oleiharenicola alkalitolerans and Oleiharenicola lentus . Cells are Gram‐negative, non‐spore‐forming, and nonpigmented cocci or diplococci (0.5–1.5 μm in diameter). The two species, and some closely related strains described in nontaxonomic literature, were all isolated from terrestrial freshwater or wastewater environments. The type strain Oleiharenicola alkalitolerans NVT T was isolated from the tailings pond of an oil sands mining operation (hence the genus name), and Oleiharenicola lentus TWA‐58 T from agricultural irrigation water, while closely related bacteria (originally dubbed “Lacunisphaera,” but probably Oleiharenicola spp.) have also been isolated from a freshwater lake. Bacteria of the genus Oleiharenicola are mesophilic (optimum 25–37°C) and neutrophilic (optimum pH 6–8), but O. alkalitolerans tolerates alkaline conditions up to pH 11. Cells reproduce by normal cell division and occur mainly as single cells or pairs. Their carbon and energy sources include several sugars, polysaccharides, and organic acids. The DNA G + C content is 65.3–66.1 mol%. The major isoprenoid quinone is MK‐7, while anteiso‐C 15:0 and iso‐C 15:0 are the major cellular fatty acids. Analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that the genus belongs to the family Opitutaceae of the phylum Verrucomicrobiota . DNA G + C content (mol%) : 65.3–66.1. Type species : Oleiharenicola alkalitolerans Rochman et al. 2018 VP . Taxonomic and Nomenclature Notes According to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN), the taxonomic status of the genus Oleiharenicola is: correct name (last update, February 2025) * . LPSN classification: Bacteria / Pseudomonadati / Verrucomicrobiota / Opitutia / Opitutales / Opitutaceae / Oleiharenicola The genus Oleiharenicola can also be recovered in the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) as g__Lacunisphaera (version v220) ** . GTDB classification: d__Bacteria / p__Verrucomicrobiota / c__Verrucomicrobiae / o__Opitutales / f__Opitutaceae / g__Lacunisphaera * Meier‐Kolthoff et al. ( 2022 ). Nucleic Acids Res , 50 , D801 – D807 ; DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab902 ** Parks

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBergey's Manual of Systematics of Archaea and BacteriaSame topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207