MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221123750 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-7003

Underlying reaction mechanisms support narrowing exemptions of ODS and HFC feedstocks under the Montreal Protocol

2022· preprint· en· W4221123750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yiyao Wei, Song Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal ProtocolRaw materialOzone layerWaste managementEnvironmental scienceOzoneChemistryEnvironmental chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the most effective multinational environmental agreement (MEA), the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer has eliminated the production of about 98% of the ozone-depleting substances (ODSs). Moreover, the most recent Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol will phase down the production of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with high global warming potentials. The use of ODSs and HFCs as feedstocks is currently exempted from the control of the Montreal Protocol and its associated amendments because it was falsely assumed that there were no feedstock emissions and that products made from feedstocks were safe in manufacture, use and disposal. In this paper, we demonstrate a previously missing mechanistic link between ODS and HFC feedstocks and a variety of chemical products that resist environmental degradation, including fluoroplastics and elastomers. We illustrate chemical reaction pathways where specific ODS and HFC gaseous molecules are made into a multitude of macromolecules that pollute the atmospheric, terrestrial and aquatic environments and harm industry workers during the manufacture. For example, the feedstock HCFC-22, itself made from chloroform (an associated feedstock), can be made into polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), a fluoroplastic in widespread use. Fluoropolymers’ extreme persistence in the environment and harmful emissions associated with their manufacture and disposal justify curtailing the upstream production of plastics from ODS and HFC feedstocks. We show that a variety of feedstock molecules and their byproducts go into the atmosphere and may alter atmospheric chemical composition. These reaction mechanisms suggest that ODS and HFC feedstocks be narrowed in their exemptions under the Montreal Protocol, via further amendments and adjustments. Considering also the global warming potential and ozone depletion potential of these feedstocks, this policy response can help mitigate stratospheric ozone depletion, climate change and plastics pollution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207