MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221131871 · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.028

Chorioamnionitis and risk of long-term neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring: a population-based cohort study

2022· article· en· W4221131871 on OpenAlexaff
Eleni Tsamantioti, Sarka Lisonkova, Giulia M. Muraca, Anne K. Örtqvist, Neda Razaz

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Canadian institutionsB.C. Women's Hospital & Health CentreUniversity of British Columbia
FundersForskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och VälfärdStockholms Läns Landsting
KeywordsMedicineChorioamnionitisHazard ratioOffspringCerebral palsyPopulationCohort studyConfidence intervalPediatricsAutismPregnancyRetrospective cohort studyProportional hazards modelCohortObstetricsGestational ageInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that in utero exposure to chorioamnionitis might increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in the offspring. However, findings on this topic have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between chorioamnionitis and neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study in Sweden. A total of 2,228,280 singleton live births and stillbirths between 1998 and 2019 were included in our study population. Data on maternal characteristics and neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring were obtained by individual record-linkages of nationwide Swedish registries. Chorioamnionitis was identified using the National Medical Birth Register. Inpatient and outpatient diagnoses were obtained for cerebral palsy, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, epilepsy, and intellectual disability. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the association between chorioamnionitis and each neurodevelopmental disorder with adjusted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. A causal mediation analysis of the relationship between chorioamnionitis and neurodevelopmental disorders with preterm delivery (<37 weeks) was performed. RESULTS: A total of 5770 (0.26%) offspring were exposed to chorioamnionitis during pregnancy. During the study's follow-up time there were 4752 (0.21%) cases of cerebral palsy, 17,897 (0.80 %) cases of epilepsy, 50,570 (2.27 %) cases of autism, 114,087 (5.12%) cases of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and 14,574 (0.65%) cases of intellectual disability. After adjusting for potential confounders, exposure to chorioamnionitis increased the hazard ratios of cerebral palsy (adjusted hazard ratio, 7.43; 95% confidence interval, 5.90-9.37), autism (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.68), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.33), and intellectual disability (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-2.58), whereas chorioamnionitis was not significantly associated with higher rates of epilepsy in offspring. Mediation analysis revealed that these associations were mainly explained through preterm delivery; however, increased risk was also observed among term infants. CONCLUSION: Chorioamnionitis increases the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly cerebral palsy, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and intellectual disability. These associations were mainly mediated through preterm delivery. Efforts for timely identification and appropriate interventions to treat infections during pregnancy will have sustained benefits in reducing the burden of neurologic complications in children at the population level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicPreterm Birth and ChorioamnionitisFrench-language works237,207