Investigating the fate of polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycle compounds in spilled oils with a microcosm weathering experiment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract One of the common toxic compound groups in crude oils are the polycyclic aromatic sulfur heterocycles (PASHs) and their related alkylated forms (APASHs). Unlike commonly investigated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their alkylated forms (APAHs), these sulfur containing compounds have not been extensively studied due to the lack of practical analytical methodology as well as expense and limited availability of chemical standards. In the current study, a newly developed polycyclic aromatic carbon (PAC) method was applied to analyze the various PASHs/APASHs in crude oil samples using PAHs as surrogate standards. To investigate the fate of PASHs/APASHs in spilled oils in the environment, microcosm systems containing various crude oils were prepared and exposed to the environment for two months, simulating the summer weather conditions of Canada’s west coast. The artificially weathered crude oil samples were analyzed for both PAH/APAH and PASH/APASH composition, and the results were compared to un-weathered counterparts of the oils. PASHs/APASHs were found to be affected by the microcosm weathering in similar ways to PAHs/APAHs. Fifteen PASHs and APASHs were found to be resistant to weathering and be potential candidates as biomarkers in oil spill forensic investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it