The Appearance of Vortices in Protoplanetary Disks in Near-infrared Scattered Light
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Azimuthally asymmetric structures have been discovered in millimeter continuum emission from many protoplanetary disks. One hypothesis is that they are vortices produced by the Rossby wave instability, for example at the edges of planet-opened gaps or dead zones. Confirming the vortex nature of these structures will have profound implications to planet formation. One way to test the hypothesis is to compare the observed morphology of vortex candidates in near-infrared scattered light with theoretical expectations. To this end, we synthesize the appearance of vortices in H-band polarized light by combining hydrodynamic and radiative transfer simulations of the Rossby wave instability at a dead-zone edge. In a disk at 140 pc, at the peak in its evolution a vortex at 65 au may appear as a radially narrow arc 50%–70% brighter compared with an axisymmetric disk model. The contrast depends on the inclination of the disk and the position angle of the vortex only weakly. Such contrast levels are well detectable in imaging observations of bright disks using instruments such as the Very Large Telescope/SPHERE, Subaru/SCExAO, and Gemini/GPI. A vortex also casts a shadow in the outer disk, which may aid its identification. Finally, at modest-to-high inclinations (e.g., 60°) a vortex may mimic a one-armed spiral. In the HD 34282 disk, such a one-armed spiral with a shadowed region on the outside has been found in scattered light. This feature roughly coincides with an azimuthal asymmetry in millimeter continuum emission, signifying the presence of a vortex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".