MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221164463 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142670

The eccentric millisecond pulsar, PSR J0955−6150

2022· article· en· W4221164463 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Serylak, V. Venkatraman Krishnan, P. C. C. Freire, Thomas M. Tauris, M. Krämer, M. Geyer, A. Parthasarathy, M. Bailes, M. C. i Bernadich, S. Buchner, M. Burgay, F. Camilo, A. Karastergiou, M. E. Lower, A. Possenti, Daniel J. Reardon, R. M. Shannon, R. Spiewak, I. H. Stairs, W. van Straten

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersFP7 International CooperationAustralian Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsSwinburne University of TechnologyCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresNational Research Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsMillisecond pulsarAstrophysicsPulsarAstronomyPulsar planetMillisecondBinary pulsar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context.PSR J0955−6150 is a member of an enigmatic class of eccentric millisecond pulsar (MSP) and helium white dwarf (He WD) systems (eMSPs), whose binary evolution is poorly understood and believed to be strikingly different to that of traditional MSP+He WD systems in circular orbits. Aims.Measuring the masses of the stars in this system is important for testing the different hypotheses for the formation of eMSPs. Methods.We carried out timing observations of this pulsar with the Parkes radio telescope using the 20 cm multibeam and ultra-wide bandwidth low-frequency (UWL) receivers, and theL-band receiver of the MeerKAT radio telescope. The pulse profiles were flux and polarisation calibrated, and a rotating-vector model (RVM) was fitted to the position angle of the linear polarisation of the combined MeerKAT data. Pulse times of arrival (ToAs) were obtained from these using standard pulsar analysis techniques and analysed using theTEMPO2 timing software. Results.Our observations reveal a strong frequency evolution of this MSP’s intensity, with a flux density spectral index (α) of −3.13(2). The improved sensitivity of MeerKAT resulted in a greater than tenfold improvement in the timing precision obtained compared to our older Parkes observations. This, combined with the eight-year timing baseline, has allowed precise measurements of a very small proper motion and three orbital post-Keplerian parameters, namely the rate of advance of periastron,ω̇ = 0.00152(1) deg yr−1, and the orthometric Shapiro delay parameters,h3 = 0.89(7) μs and ς = 0.88(2). Assuming general relativity, we obtainMp = 1.71(2) M⊙for the mass of the pulsar andMc = 0.254(2) M⊙for the mass of the companion; the orbital inclination is 83.2(4) degrees. Crucially, assuming that the position angle of the linear polarisation follows the RVM, we find that the spin axis has a misalignment relative to the orbital angular momentum of > 4.8deg at 99% confidence level. Conclusions.While the value ofMpfalls well within the wide range observed in eMSPs,Mcis significantly smaller than expected from several formation hypotheses proposed, which are therefore unlikely to be correct and can be ruled out;Mcis also significantly different from the expected value for an ideal low mass X-ray binary evolution scenario. If the misalignment between the spin axis of the pulsar and the orbital angular momentum is to be believed, it suggests that the unknown process that created the orbital eccentricity of the binary was also capable of changing its orbital orientation, an important evidence for understanding the origin of eMSPs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207