MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221165467 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac743f

The Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey: Changing-look Quasar Candidates from Multi-epoch Spectroscopy in SDSS-IV

2022· article· en· W4221165467 on OpenAlexafffund
Lina Pulgarin-Duque, Scott F. Anderson, Chelsea L. MacLeod, Michael Eracleous, John J. Ruan, Jessie C. Runnoe, M. J. Graham, Benjamin R. Roulston, Donald P. Schneider, Austin Ahlf, Dmitry Bizyaev, Joel R. Brownstein, Sierra A. Dodd, Daniel J. Hoover, Cayenne Matt, A. Merloni, Kaike Pan, Arnulfo G. Ramírez, Margaret Ridder

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaBishop's University
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryPlanetary Science DivisionDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryUniversity of Colorado BoulderInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasMax-Planck-Institut für AstrophysikEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityMax-Planck-GesellschaftMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoQueen's UniversityQueen's University BelfastWeizmann Institute of ScienceUniversity of OxfordDurham UniversityYork UniversityUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoSpace Telescope Science InstituteLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameCarnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity of WashingtonAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJohns Hopkins UniversityOffice of ScienceMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieUniversity of EdinburghCarnegie Institution of WashingtonUniversity of UtahOhio State UniversitySmithsonian InstitutionU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNew Mexico State UniversityStockholms UniversitetUniversity of PortsmouthVanderbilt UniversityScience Mission DirectorateYale UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsQuasarAstrophysicsPhysicsSupermassive black holeEmission spectrumActive galactic nucleusSpectroscopySpectral linePopulationAstronomyGalaxyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Active galactic nuclei (AGN) can vary significantly in their rest-frame optical/UV continuum emission, and with strong associated changes in broad line emission, on much shorter timescales than predicted by standard models of accretion disks around supermassive black holes. Most such changing-look or changing-state AGN—and at higher luminosities, changing-look quasars (CLQs)—have been found via spectroscopic follow-up of known quasars showing strong photometric variability. The Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV) includes repeat spectroscopy of large numbers of previously known quasars, many selected irrespective of photometric variability, and with spectral epochs separated by months to decades. Our visual examination of these repeat spectra for strong broad line variability yielded 61 newly discovered CLQ candidates. We quantitatively compare spectral epochs to measure changes in continuum and H β broad line emission, finding 19 CLQs, of which 15 are newly recognized. The parent sample includes only broad line quasars, so our study tends to find objects that have dimmed, i.e., turn-off CLQs. However, we nevertheless find four turn-on CLQs that meet our criteria, albeit with broad lines in both dim and bright states. We study the response of H β and Mg ii emission lines to continuum changes. The Eddington ratios of CLQs are low, and/or their H β broad line width is large relative to the overall quasar population. Repeat quasar spectroscopy in the upcoming SDSS-V black hole Mapper program will reveal significant numbers of CLQs, enhancing our understanding of the frequency and duty cycle of such strong variability, and the physics and dynamics of the phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→