MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W422207905

The UK Student Visa Cut and its Implication to International Education in Thailand

2012· article· en· W422207905 on OpenAlex
Supachok Wiriyacosol, Hatairat Lertjanyakit

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Journal of Business and Management · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigher educationService (business)Political scienceInternational educationPublic relationsEconomic growthBusinessMarketingEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the flow of international students in higher education to five most popular English-speaking countries i.e. Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, the US and also Thailand which is included as a typical ASEAN source as well as destination of international students. The possible effects of the new UK student visa rule, aiming to reduce student visa by 25% starting April 2011 are studied. A source-destination student flow model is developed based on secondary data to explain the extent of the change in student enrolment in higher education due to the UK student visa reduction. A questionnaire interview was carried out on stakeholders in student flow from Thailand to the UK including education service agents, higher education institutes representatives from the UK, and prospective Thai students seeking for education in the UK. These stakeholders felt neutral about the overpopulation of international students in the UK and the need to reduce the number of student visa. They, however, realized that the student visa cut was inevitable and they have to find strategies to co33.3pe with this visa cut. The majority of 66.7% of the education service agents will maintain the present level of effort in recruiting Thai students for the UK while 33.3% adopt the wait and see attitude and none will “increase the effort” in student recruitment for the UK. 50% of the higher education institutes in the UK consider both the “maintain the present effort” while another 50% adopt a “wait and see” policy and none will “increase the effort” for student recruitment. As for the prospective students, the majority of 83.3% adopt a “look elsewhere” for education destinations while a minority of 16.7% will “maintain the present effort” in trying to find a seat in the higher education institutes in the UK, and none will “increase the effort” in trying to get education in the UK. Most of the stakeholders agree that there is an opportunity for the growth of international education in Thailand which can accept students from ASEAN countries. However, the improvement of quality and the reduction of cost may need to be considered. The problem of low English skills in Thai students seems to be a major obstacle to international education in Thailand which uses English as the international language. The problem about low English skills of Thai students needs to be solved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it