MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223628585 · doi:10.1016/j.bbiosy.2022.100049

Vascular tissue engineering from human adipose tissue: fundamental phenotype of its resident microvascular endothelial cells and stromal/stem cells

2022· article· en· W4223628585 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeremy A. Antonyshyn, Meghan J. McFadden, Anthony O. Gramolini, Stefan O.P. Hofer, J. Paul Santerre

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomaterials and Biosystems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsAdipose tissueStromal cellStem cellTissue engineeringPhenotypeCell biologyBiologyPathologyMedicineEndocrinologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adipose tissue is an abundant, accessible, and uniquely dispensable source of cells for vascular tissue engineering. Despite its intrinsic endothelial cells, considerable effort is directed at deriving endothelium from its resident stem and progenitor cells. Here, we investigate the composition of human adipose tissue and characterize the phenotypes of its constituent cells in order to help ascertain their potential utility for vascular tissue engineering. Unsupervised clustering based on cell-surface protein signatures failed to detect CD45 – CD31 – VEGFR2 + endothelial progenitor cells within adipose tissue, but supported further investigation of its resident CD45 – CD31 + microvascular endothelial cells (HAMVECs) and CD45 – CD31 – stromal/stem cells (ASCs). The endothelial differentiation of ASCs altered their proteome, but it remained distinct from that of primary endothelial cell controls – as well as HAMVECs – regardless of their arterial-venous specification or macrovascular-microvascular origin. Rather, ASCs retained a proteome indicative of a perivascular phenotype, which was supported by their ability to facilitate the capillary morphogenesis of HAMVECs. This study supports the use of HAMVECs for the generation of endothelium. It suggests that the utility of ASCs for vascular tissue engineering lies in their capacity to remodel the extracellular matrix and to function as mural cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomaterials and BiosystemsSame topicElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207