MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224006428 · doi:10.1021/acsanm.2c00831

Visible-Light-Driven Production of Solar Fuels Catalyzed by Nanosized Porphyrin-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks and Covalent–Organic Frameworks: A Review

2022· review· en· W4224006428 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul Asselin, Pierre D. Harvey

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Nano Materials · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSolar fuelMetal-organic frameworkPorphyrinPhotocatalysisMaterials scienceNanotechnologyCovalent bondCovalent organic frameworkPhotochemistryElectron transferSolar energyCatalysisChemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porphyrin-based materials are excellent chromophores because they strongly absorb visible light and their relatively low-energy lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals thermodynamically favor photoinduced electron transfer. They can generate charge-transfer excited states with and without cocatalyst(s) and ease energy transfer and ultrafast excitation energy migration. Combined with synthetic accessibility, these qualities make them ideal building blocks for porous metal–organic framework (MOF)- and covalent–organic framework (COF)-based photocatalysts to produce solar fuels. This review first describes the structures of the most common porphyrinic MOFs and COFs and their excited-state properties and semiconducting behavior as well as that of derived composites. The generally accepted mechanisms of formation of H2, CH4 and derivatives, and N2 are then reviewed, followed by the detailed examples of nano-MOFs and nano-COFs used for the said purpose: characteristic parameters such as rates of production, turnover numbers (TONs), turnover frequencies (TOFs), and apparent quantum efficiencies are described and compared. This shows that porphyrin-based MOFs and COFs are efficient solar-fuel-producing photocatalysts, with characteristics comparable to those of nonporphyrinic MOF and COF photocatalysts, although, on some occasions, the rates of production fall short of record values. Conversely, porphyrinic MOFs and COFs exhibit the greatest TONs and TOFs of any solar-fuel-producing MOFs or COFs but still face shortcomings concerning selectivity in CH4 production because of the many possible side products. Importantly, while the best rate of photoproduction of solar fuels has been observed from nanoscale photocatalysts, there seem to be no drastic differences in the rate (within μmol–1 h–1 and mmol g–1 h–1) between nanoscale and microscale heterogeneous photocatalysts. This observation suggests that the more active sites are mostly located at or near the surface of the particles. Overall, nanosized porphyrin-based MOFs and COFs show rich and promising photocatalytic properties for generating solar fuels but still have room for improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Nano MaterialsSame topicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207