Implementing subtype‐specific pre‐clinical models of breast cancer to study pre‐treatment aspirin effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Backgorund Prior data suggest pre‐diagnostic aspirin use impacts breast tumour biology and patient outcome. Here, we employed faithful surgical resection models of HER2+ and triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC), to study outcome and response mechanisms across breast cancer subtypes. Method NOD/SCID mice were implanted with HER2+ MDA‐MB‐231/LN/2‐4/H2N, trastuzumab‐resistant HER2+ HCC1954 or a TNBC patient‐derived xenograft (PDX). A daily low‐dose aspirin regimen commenced until primary tumours reached ~250 mm 3 and subsequently resected. MDA‐MB‐231/LN/2‐4/H2N mice were monitored for metastasis utilising imaging. To interrogate the survival benefit of pre‐treatment aspirin, 3 weeks post‐resection, HCC1954/TNBC animals received standard‐of‐care (SOC) chemotherapy for 6 weeks. Primary tumour response to aspirin was interrogated using immunohistochemistry. Results Aspirin delayed time to metastasis in MDA‐MB‐231/LN/2‐4/H2N xenografts and decreased growth of HER2 + /TNBC primary tumours. Lymphangiogenic factors and lymph vessels number were decreased in HER2 + tumours. However, no survival benefit was seen in aspirin pre‐treated animals (HCC1954/TNBC) that further received adjuvant SOC, compared with animals treated with SOC alone. In an effort to study mechanisms responsible for the observed reduction in lymphangiogenesis in HER2 + BC we utilised an in vitro co‐culture system of HCC1954 tumour cells and mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC). Aspirin abrogated the secretion of VEGF‐C in MSCs and also decreased the lymph/angiogenic potential of the MSCs and HCC1954 by tubule formation assay. Furthermore, aspirin decreased the secretion of uPA in HCC1954 cells potentially diminishing its metastatic capability. Conclusion Our data employing clinically relevant models demonstrate that aspirin alters breast tumour biology. However, aspirin may not represent a robust chemo‐preventative agent in the HER2 + or TNBC setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".