RETRACTED: Ataxie spinocérébelleuse de type 31 (SCA 31) : revue de la littérature à la lumière du premier diagnostic chez un patient caucasien ; un phénotype différent chez les patients non-japonais ?
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Post-publication record
- Nature
- Retraction
- Reason
- Date of Article and/or Notice Unknown;Error in Results and/or Conclusions;Notice - Limited or No Information;Temporary Removal;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;Removed;
- Date
- 4/15/2022 0:00
- Flagged by OpenAlex?
- Yes
Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement — it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Revue Neurologique
- Topic
- Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Field
- Neuroscience
- Canadian institutions
- Dr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital CentreMoncton Hospital
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- PhilosophyHumanitiesPsychology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no