MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224060003 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000001593

Horner Syndrome in Giant Cell Arteritis: Case Series and Review of the Literature

2022· article· en· W4224060003 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorner syndromeGiant cell arteritisComplicationDiplopiaPalsyAbducens nerveVasculitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic inflammatory vasculitis that affects medium- and large-sized arteries and can result in permanent vision loss. In rare instances, Horner syndrome has been noticed at the time of GCA diagnosis, although the mechanism of both diagnoses occurring at the same time is not entirely understood. We reviewed 53 charts of all patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven GCA in tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice to find patients who presented with new onset of Horner syndrome at the time of GCA diagnosis. METHODS: Two patients with biopsy-confirmed GCA who presented with concurrent Horner syndrome were found. Data on age, sex, and ophthalmic and neuroradiologic examination findings were collected. RESULTS: Patient 1 was a 67-year-old man who presented with new onset of vertical binocular diplopia and was diagnosed with right fourth cranial nerve palsy. He then developed left ptosis and miosis, and was diagnosed with Horner syndrome by pharmacologic testing. He also had persistently elevated inflammatory markers. Patient 2 was a 71-year-old man who presented with new onset of binocular vertical diplopia, bitemporal headaches, and jaw ache. Both of his inflammatory markers were elevated. On examination, he had left ptosis and myosis, and small comitant left hypertropia. The diagnosis of left Horner syndrome was confirmed on pharmacologic testing and left hypertropia was attributed to skew deviation. Both patients underwent temporal artery biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of GCA. Treatment with high dose of oral corticosteroids commenced, and vertical diplopia has completely resolved in both patients. Horner syndrome persisted in Patient 1 and resolved in Patient 2. MRI and MR angiography of the brain and neck were unrevealing in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: This case series describes 2 patients with new diagnosis of GCA and concurrent Horner syndrome, with new diagnosis of likely nuclear/fascicular fourth nerve palsy in one patient and skew deviation in the other. In both patients, vasculitis presumptively affected vertebral arteries and their branches supplying the first-order sympathetic neurons in the brainstem. Considering the severe complication of permanent vision loss in GCA, this diagnosis should be considered in older patients presenting with concurrent new onset of Horner syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuro-OphthalmologySame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207