MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224060003 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000001593

Horner Syndrome in Giant Cell Arteritis: Case Series and Review of the Literature

2022· article· en· W4224060003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorner syndromeGiant cell arteritisComplicationDiplopiaPalsyAbducens nerveVasculitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a systemic inflammatory vasculitis that affects medium- and large-sized arteries and can result in permanent vision loss. In rare instances, Horner syndrome has been noticed at the time of GCA diagnosis, although the mechanism of both diagnoses occurring at the same time is not entirely understood. We reviewed 53 charts of all patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven GCA in tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice to find patients who presented with new onset of Horner syndrome at the time of GCA diagnosis. METHODS: Two patients with biopsy-confirmed GCA who presented with concurrent Horner syndrome were found. Data on age, sex, and ophthalmic and neuroradiologic examination findings were collected. RESULTS: Patient 1 was a 67-year-old man who presented with new onset of vertical binocular diplopia and was diagnosed with right fourth cranial nerve palsy. He then developed left ptosis and miosis, and was diagnosed with Horner syndrome by pharmacologic testing. He also had persistently elevated inflammatory markers. Patient 2 was a 71-year-old man who presented with new onset of binocular vertical diplopia, bitemporal headaches, and jaw ache. Both of his inflammatory markers were elevated. On examination, he had left ptosis and myosis, and small comitant left hypertropia. The diagnosis of left Horner syndrome was confirmed on pharmacologic testing and left hypertropia was attributed to skew deviation. Both patients underwent temporal artery biopsy, which confirmed the diagnosis of GCA. Treatment with high dose of oral corticosteroids commenced, and vertical diplopia has completely resolved in both patients. Horner syndrome persisted in Patient 1 and resolved in Patient 2. MRI and MR angiography of the brain and neck were unrevealing in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: This case series describes 2 patients with new diagnosis of GCA and concurrent Horner syndrome, with new diagnosis of likely nuclear/fascicular fourth nerve palsy in one patient and skew deviation in the other. In both patients, vasculitis presumptively affected vertebral arteries and their branches supplying the first-order sympathetic neurons in the brainstem. Considering the severe complication of permanent vision loss in GCA, this diagnosis should be considered in older patients presenting with concurrent new onset of Horner syndrome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it