MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224129144 · doi:10.22215/etd/2022-14858

Evaluating Evidence-informed Decision-making in the Management and Conservation of British Columbia’s Fish and Wildlife Resources

2022· dissertation· en· W4224129144 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Andrew N. Kadykalo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Science and Mapping
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGenome British ColumbiaFreshwater Fisheries Society of British ColumbiaGenome Canada
KeywordsWildlifeStakeholderIndigenousEmpirical evidenceEnvironmental resource managementWildlife conservationGeographyNatural resourceWildlife managementNatural resource managementPublic relationsEnvironmental planningFisheryPolitical scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two key informants/expert thought leaders who I now consider friends and mentors were especially crucial to the success of this PhD project -thanks Adrian Clarke of the Freshwater Fisheries Society of BC and Dean Joseph of the Yekooche First Nation.Special thanks to Matt Spencer, whose computational and algorithmic

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.113
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.352
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.598

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1130.352
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.007
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0140.005
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0050.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCognitive Science and MappingFrench-language works237,207