MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224134958 · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2022.03.006

Visit-To-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and Subthreshold Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults

2022· article· en· W4224134958 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Isabel J. Sible, Jung Yun Jang, David L. Sultzer, Daniel A. Nation

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationEisaiU.S. Department of DefenseMeso Scale DiagnosticsServierBioClinicaBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyBiogen
KeywordsBlood pressureDementiaDepression (economics)MedicineInternal medicineRisk factorStroke (engine)Cognitive declineProspective cohort studyCohortGeriatric Depression ScaleCardiologyOdds ratioPhysical therapyDiseasePsychiatryCognitionDepressive symptoms

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Depression is related to increased risk for dementia, possibly through links with cerebrovascular disease. Blood pressure variability is an emerging risk factor for cerebrovascular disease and dementia, but relationships with affective symptoms remain understudied. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospective cohort study. SETTING: Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. PARTICIPANTS: 505 older adults without history of dementia or recent depression underwent three to four blood pressure measurements over 12 months and completed a self-report measure of depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale - 15 Item) at study baseline and 24-months follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Blood pressure variability was calculated as variability independent of mean and maximum minus minimum. Regression models investigated relationships between blood pressure variability and severity of self-reported depressive symptoms at 24-months follow-up after controlling for several variables, including average blood pressure, antihypertensive use, antidepressant use, and baseline depressive symptom severity. RESULTS: Elevated diastolic blood pressure variability was related to greater total depressive symptom score at follow-up (ß = .16 [95% CI 0.02, .30]; p = 0.03), with specific contribution from increased severity of symptoms of dysphoria (odds ratio = 1.35 [95% CI 1.07, 1.75]; p = 0.02). Blood pressure variability was not significantly related to other symptom subscales, including those reflecting life satisfaction or withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that elevated diastolic blood pressure variability is related to subthreshold depressive symptomatology in older adults without history of dementia or recent depression, independent of average blood pressure. Blood pressure variability may be an understudied vascular risk factor linked with depression and cognitive impairment, with potential therapeutic implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Geriatric PsychiatrySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207