MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224212214 · doi:10.1002/eat.23713

Weight control beliefs in the treatment of binge‐eating disorder: Why might they matter?

2022· article· en· W4224212214 on OpenAlexafffund
Michèle Laliberté, Kristen M. Lucibello

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Eating Disorders · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMcMaster UniversitySt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOvereatingBinge-eating disorderBinge eatingWeight lossPsychologyEating disordersWeight managementWeight controlClinical psychologyCognitionBulimia nervosaPsychiatryObesityMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The belief in personal control over weight (BCWeight) is positively associated, while the belief in control over healthy lifestyle with weight acceptance (BCLifestyle) is negatively associated with disordered eating, body dissatisfaction, and low self-esteem. This study examined how weight control beliefs are impacted by cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for binge-eating disorder (BED) that provides evidence and choice regarding weight management options; and assessed whether changes in weight control beliefs are associated with treatment outcomes. METHOD: Participants were 57 patients consecutively referred to an outpatient eating disorder clinic from 2013-2017 for BED treatment. Using retrospective self-reported program-evaluation data, baseline to post-CBT changes in weight control beliefs were evaluated, as well as whether these changes were associated with the change in the drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, fear of loss of control over eating, and self-esteem. RESULTS: BCLifestyle significantly increased over CBT; BCWeight significantly decreased. Increases in BCLifestyle were associated with the reduced drive for thinness, body dissatisfaction, and fear of loss of control overeating. Decreases in BCWeight were associated with improved self-esteem. DISCUSSION: BED CBT that provides science on weight management options is associated with positive changes in weight control beliefs, which are associated with measures of recovery from BED. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for binge-eating disorder decreases the belief that one can and should control one's weight, and increases the belief that one should strive for a healthy lifestyle and accept one's weight. These changes in beliefs are associated with improved treatment outcomes. CBT that gives patients evidence on different weight management options addresses patient obesity concerns and is related to positive change in weight control beliefs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Eating DisordersSame topicEating Disorders and BehaviorsFrench-language works237,207