MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4224223072 · doi:10.1007/s43678-022-00314-z

Correction to: Treatments, resource utilization, and outcomes of COVID-19 patients presenting to emergency departments across pandemic waves: an observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN)

2022· erratum· en· W4224223072 on OpenAlexaffabout
Corinne M. Hohl, Rhonda J. Rosychuk, Jeffrey P. Hau, Jake Hayward, Megan Landes, Justin W. Yan, Daniel K. Ting, Michelle Welsford, Patrick Archambault, Éric Mercier, Kavish Chandra, Philip J. Davis, Samuel Vaillancourt, Murdoch Leeies, Serena S Small, Laurie J. Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of SaskatchewanSaint John Regional HospitalInstitut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de QuébecUniversité LavalSt. Michael's HospitalCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de Chaudière-AppalacheMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of TorontoWestern UniversityHamilton Health SciencesCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesUniversity Health NetworkVancouver Coastal HealthVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Observational studyPandemicMedicineEmergency department2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedical emergencySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Emergency medicineMEDLINEFamily medicineVirologyNursingOutbreakInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, the name of the Canadian COVID-19 Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) investigators for the Network of Canadian Emergency Researchers, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group was incorrect in the author line. The original article has been corrected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.148
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.178

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.148
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0050.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.301
GPT teacher head0.477
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine→Same topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts→French-language works237,207→