Model‐informed drug development of voxelotor in sickle cell disease: Exposure‐response analysis to support dosing and confirm mechanism of action
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by the production of sickle hemoglobin (HbS), which when deoxygenated, polymerizes leading to red blood cell damage and hemolytic anemia, a defining feature of SCD. Voxelotor (Oxbryta) is a small molecule inhibitor of HbS polymerization that disrupts the polymerization mechanism by binding HbS to increase HbS oxygen affinity. Voxelotor is approved in the United States for the treatment of SCD in patients greater than or equal to 12 years of age at a 1500 mg once-daily (q.d.) dose. These exposure-response analyses aimed to evaluate the relationships between voxelotor whole blood concentration and change from baseline (CFB) in clinical measures of anemia and hemolysis and between voxelotor whole blood and plasma concentrations and the incidence of selected safety end points to confirm the voxelotor mechanism of action and to support the clinical dose recommendation. In patients treated with voxelotor up to 72 weeks, CFB hemoglobin (Hb) increased linearly (p < 0.001) with increasing voxelotor concentration and percent Hb occupancy and increases in CFB Hb corresponded to improvements in measures of hemolysis. The target 1 g/dl increase in CFB Hb was achieved with 1500 mg voxelotor q.d. Significant relationships were observed between voxelotor exposures and grade greater than or equal to 1 increased alanine aminotransferase and decreased white blood cell count; however, most events were grade 1. No clinically important covariate effects on voxelotor efficacy or safety were observed. Overall, these analyses support 1500 mg q.d. as the therapeutic dose for voxelotor in adults and adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".