Conceptual Fundamentals of Building an Innovative Model of Professional Training of a Teacher of Physical Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article considers education as the main factor and indispensable condition of socio-economic progress, the most important value and main capital of modern society, the priority and driving force of which is a person capable of search, independent, creative thinking, learning, socio-professional activities and creativity. The need for a radical change in attitude to physical culture is emphasized, its great importance is emphasized as a universal and personal value that encourages people to take care of their health, to engage in self-education in this field throughout life. Accordingly, the need to improve the training of highly qualified personnel in the field of physical culture and sports is emphasized. The teacher must be able to educate the next generation to be creative and independent. Therefore, the development of new approaches to the content and organization of the educational process, which provide and stimulate the personal activity of the student, is crucial in the system of training specialists with higher physical education. The orientation of professional pedagogical education on the individual and creative development of the personality of a physical education teacher is considered as a means of improvement, and as a strategic direction of professional training of teachers on the basis of personality-oriented approach. Introduction of humanistic models designed to implement a personal approach related to the transfer of emphasis from the process of learning (teaching) to the process of individualized learning. In this regard, before the training of future teachers of physical culture is the task of transition to personality-oriented education, the priority of personal development, its ability to self-improvement, self-realization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".