MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224235648 · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac6829

SleepSEEG: automatic sleep scoring using intracranial EEG recordings only

2022· article· en· W4224235648 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicolás von Ellenrieder, Laure Peter‐Derex, Jean Gotman, Birgit Frauscher

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neural Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsElectroencephalographySleep (system call)Computer scienceArtificial intelligencePsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. To perform automatic sleep scoring based only on intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG), without the need for scalp EEG), electrooculography (EOG) and electromyography (EMG), in order to study sleep, epilepsy, and their interaction. Approach. Data from 33 adult patients was used for development and training of the automatic scoring algorithm using both oscillatory and non-oscillatory spectral features. The first step consisted in unsupervised clustering of channels based on feature variability. For each cluster the classification was done in two steps, a multiclass tree followed by binary classification trees to distinguish the more challenging stage N1. The test data consisted in 11 patients, in whom the classification was done independently for each channel and then combined to get a single stage per epoch. Main results. An overall agreement of 78% was observed in the test set between the sleep scoring of the algorithm using iEEG alone and two human experts scoring based on scalp EEG, EOG and EMG. Balanced sensitivity and specificity were obtained for the different sleep stages. The performance was excellent for stages W, N2, and N3, and good for stage R, but with high variability across patients. The performance for the challenging stage N1 was poor, but at a similar level as for published algorithms based on scalp EEG. High confidence epochs in different stages (other than N1) can be identified with median per patient specificity >80%. Significance. The automatic algorithm can perform sleep scoring of long-term recordings of patients with intracranial electrodes undergoing presurgical evaluation in the absence of scalp EEG, EOG and EMG, which are normally required to define sleep stages but are difficult to use in the context of intracerebral studies. It also constitutes a valuable tool to generate hypotheses regarding local aspects of sleep, and will be significant for sleep evaluation in clinical epileptology and neuroscience research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neural EngineeringSame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207