MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Clinically Validated, Broadly Active, Oral Viral SuperinfectionTherapy Could Mitigate Symptoms in Early-stage COVID-19 Patients

2022· article· en· W4224237267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInfectious Disorders - Drug Targets · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperinfectionVirologyMedicineVirusInterferonImmunologyViral load

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: More than 200 viruses infect humans, but treatments are available for less than ten of them. To narrow the gap between ‘bugs and drugs,’ a paradigm shift is required. The “one drug, one bug” approach can be expanded to a “one drug, multiple bugs” strategy such that the host’s defense system is targeted rather than the virus. Viral superinfection therapy (SIT) activates interferon genes’ natural, antiviral defense system of host cells following exposure to viral infection, e.g., superinfection with an attenuated infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) with the release of its double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) cargo inside host cells. An attenuated IBDV therapeutic vaccine has successfully treated hepatitis A virus infection (HAV) in marmoset monkeys as well as acute hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections (HBV/HCV) in 42 patients. SIT has also been shown to be safe and effective in four patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection with hepatic decompensation. The proof-of-principle of SIT has also been demonstrated in a 43-year-old male patient with COVID-19. Three doses of orally administered IBDV (3x106 IU) alleviated most of his COVID-19 symptoms; even his sense of smell returned within a week. Two additional COVID-19 patients responded similarly to oral treatment with IBDV. Furthermore, a severe herpes zoster ophthalmicus outbreak with orbital edema responded to a combination of acyclovir and 7 doses of IBDV (7x106 IU) within a few days. IBDV is simple to manufacture and affordable, even in resource-limited settings. Acid-resistant IBDV can be orally administered in an outpatient setting, providing simple dosing and high medication adherence. Under an Emergency Use Authorization, the broad-spectrum IBDV drug candidate could be tested immediately in clinical trials and rapidly distributed to millions of early-stage patients with COVID-19. The German Paul Ehrlich Institute is currently supporting a phase I safety study for persons acutely infected with SARS‑CoV-2. An expert team of the US National Institutes of Health-sponsored ACTIV public-private partnership came to the conclusion that the IBDV drug candidate shows merit as a potential treatment for COVID- 19, and an FDA-approved clinical trial is in the pipelines in Los Angeles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it