Physical Activity in Renal Disease and the Effect on Hypertension: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Exercise is an effective strategy for blood pressure (BP) reduction in the general population, but its efficacy for the management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is not known. We evaluated the difference in 24-h ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) with exercise training in people with moderate to severe CKD. METHODS: Participants with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15-44 mL/min per 1.73 m2 and SBP >120 mm Hg were randomized to receive thrice-weekly moderate-intensity aerobic-based exercise over 24 weeks, or usual care. Phase 1 included supervised in-center and home-based sessions for 8 weeks. Phase 2 was 16 weeks of home-based sessions. BP, arterial stiffness, cardiorespiratory fitness, and markers of cardiovascular (CV) risk were analyzed using mixed linear regression. RESULTS: We randomized 44 people; 36% were female, the median age was 69 years, 55% had diabetes, and the median eGFR was 28 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Compared with usual care, there was no significant change in 24-ambulatory SBP at 8 weeks (2.96 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -2.56, 8.49) or 24 weeks. Peak oxygen uptake improved by 1.9 mL/kg/min in the exercise group (95% CI: 0.03, 3.79) at 8 weeks with a trend toward higher body mass index 1.84 kg/m2 (95% CI: -0.10, 3.78) and fat free mass, but this was not sustained at 24 weeks. Markers of CV risk were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an improvement in peak aerobic capacity and body composition, we did not detect a change in 24-h ambulatory SBP in people with moderate-to-severe CKD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".