MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224253962 · doi:10.1049/gtd2.12480

Using structured laser illumination planar imaging (SLIPI) as a new technique to monitor the degradation of biodegradable oils in electrical power transformers

2022· article· en· W4224253962 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas Koffi, K. S. Kassi, G. Kone, Janvier Sylvestre N’cho, Mensah Edoé, Jocelyne Bosson, I. Fofana, Jérémie T. Zoueu

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersStyrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete
KeywordsTransformerPlanarMaterials scienceDegradation (telecommunications)LaserElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringOpticsVoltagePhysicsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The aging process of the insulating oils of an electrical transformer is initiated as soon as the transformer is put into service. The quality of these oils must therefore be rigorously evaluated to have reliable and exploitable data for decision‐making. In general, the decision is to continue monitoring, reclaiming/regenerating, or replacing the oil in extreme cases. Thus, early diagnosis of power transformer oils helps prevent potential breakdowns that could considerably impact the electrical energy transmission and distribution network. This research used an imaging technique called SLIPI (Structured Laser Illumination Planar Imaging) to accurately determine the extinction coefficient in different samples of optically dense biodegradable oils (natural and synthetic esters). The variation in the extinction coefficient as a function of the aging of these biodegradable oils under test has been investigated. The results indicate that the SLIPI is reliable as a diagnostic tool for biodegradable oils in power transformers. This technique could therefore be an alternative solution to the conventional monitoring methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.755

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207