Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Page’s transatlantic creative partnership with Harald Kreutzberg (1932–1936) was remarkable not only for its transnational flow of modernist aesthetics but also for its transcendence of the usual genre divisions—ballet versus modern dance. Anchoring and facilitating such boundary crossings were enduring friendships—a sort of artistic ménage à trois—among Page, Kreutzberg, and Friedrich (Fritz) Wilckens, Kreutzberg’s piano accompanist and lifelong companion. From this triadic relationship, the artists derived pleasure and benefit beyond that of mere career advancement: gender role flexibility in performance, human agency in a cataclysmic world, and compassion—not to mention the opportunity to hedge one’s bets (allegiances and affiliations) in times of political and economic uncertainty. With Chicago as the focal point, they toured the Midwest and other regions of the United States, Japan, and Canada. This chapter explores the chemistry of their collaboration, juxtaposing the contrasting styles of movement in particular solos and unpacking a key duet, Bacchanale (1934, Malipiero), performed first in Futuristic style then as a parody of itself (Wilckens). The project gave Page inlet into modern dance aesthetics, vehicles, and venues—experience she would later parlay into a cosmopolitan, modernist identity, thus preempting the threat of consignment to Midwestern obscurity. Meanwhile, touring abroad as a transnational subject offered Kreutzberg a means of coping with the rising fascism and homophobic militancy of the Third Reich—as a gay man whose identity was antithetical to the nation-state of which he was ultimately to become a pawn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.155 | 0.049 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".