MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224273389 · doi:10.12927/hcq.2022.26778

Ensuring Equity and Inclusion in Virtual Care Best Practices for Diverse Populations of Youth with Chronic Pain

2022· article· en· W4224273389 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Kathryn A. Birnie, Tieghan Killackey, Gillian Backlin, F. Gavin, Christine R. Harris, Isabel Jordán, Laesa Kim, Justina Marianayagam, Jenna Swidrovich, Corinne Lalonde, Lanre Tunji-Ajayi, Tim F. Oberlander, Melanie Kirby‐Allen, Simon J. Lambert, Jaris Swidrovich, Mélanie Noël, Chitra Lalloo, Jennifer Stinson

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Quarterly · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterprofessional Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanHospital for Sick ChildrenThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of TorontoBC Children's HospitalAssembly of First NationsNorthern Ontario Academic Medicine AssociationCanadian Cancer SocietyPacific Alzheimer Research FoundationPositive Living Society of British ColumbiaAlberta Children's Hospital
FundersHealthcare Excellence CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement
KeywordsBest practiceInclusion (mineral)Chronic painIndigenousEquity (law)Health carePandemicNursingMedicinePsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychiatrySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poor access to care is a top patient-oriented research priority for youth with chronic pain in Canada, and the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these concerns. Our patient-oriented project team engaged with marginalized and racialized youth with chronic pain (Black youth with sickle cell disease, Indigenous youth and youth with complex medical needs) and their families to ensure that best practice recommendations for virtual care are inclusive and equitable. Input provided through virtual round-table discussions improved recommendations for leveraging, implementing and selecting best platforms for virtual care for youth with chronic pain and identified new gaps for future research, practice and policy change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare QuarterlySame topicInterprofessional Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207