Pilot-scale outdoor trial of a cyanobacterial consortium at pH 11 in a photobioreactor at high latitude
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The biomass of microalgae and cyanobacteria yields a variety of products. Outdoor pilot plant trials typically grow a single species at circumneutral pH and provide CO2 by gas sparging. Here a cyanobacterial consortium was grown at high pH (beyond 11) and high dissolved carbonate concentrations (0.5 M) in an outdoor 1,150 L tubular photobioreactor for 130 days in Calgary, Canada. The aim was to assess the productivity and robustness of the consortium. Importantly, the system was designed to enable future integration of air capture of CO2. Productivity was between 3.1 and 5.8 g ash-free dry weight per square metre per day, depending on biomass density and month. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing showed that cyanobacterium Candidatus “Phormidium alkaliphilum” made up 80% of the consortium. The consortium displayed robust growth and adapted to environmental conditions. Bicarbonate uptake pushed medium pH past 11, demonstrating the ability to achieve CO2 delivery by air capture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".