The gut microbiome and early-life growth in a population with high prevalence of stunting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Stunting affects one-in-five children globally and is associated with greater infectious morbidity, mortality and neurodevelopmental deficits. Recent evidence suggests that the early-life gut microbiome affects child growth through immune, metabolic and endocrine pathways, and microbiome perturbations may contribute to undernutrition. We examined early-life fecal microbiome composition and function in 875 stool samples collected longitudinally in 335 children from 1-18 months of age in rural Zimbabwe, from a cluster-randomized trial of improved water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH), and improved infant and young child feeding (IYCF). Using whole metagenome shotgun sequencing, we examined the effect of the interventions, in addition to environmental or host factors including maternal HIV infection, on the succession of the early-life gut microbiome, and employed extreme gradient boosting machines (XGBoost) to model microbiome maturation and to predict child growth. WASH and IYCF interventions had little impact on the fecal microbiome, however children who were HIV-exposed but uninfected exhibited over-diversification and over-maturity of the early-life gut microbiome in addition to reduced abundance of Bifidobacteria species. Taxonomic microbiome features were poorly predictive of linear and ponderal growth, however functional metagenomic features, particularly B-vitamin and nucleotide biosynthesis pathways, moderately predicted both attained linear and ponderal growth and growth velocity. We find that the succession of the gut microbiome in a population at risk of stunting is unresponsive to WASH and IYCF interventions, but is strongly associated with maternal HIV infection, which may contribute to deficits in growth. New approaches targeting the gut microbiome in early childhood may complement efforts to combat child undernutrition. One sentence summary The gut microbiome of rural Zimbabwean infants undergoes programmed maturation that is unresponsive to sanitation and nutrition interventions but is comprehensively modified by maternal HIV infection and can moderately predict linear growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".