MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224440189 · doi:10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.01.050

39 Onset of Flibanserin Treatment Effect in Postmenopausal Women Assessed by Subdomain Scores of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI)

2022· article· en· W4224440189 on OpenAlexaffabout
J Simon, M Shapiro, L Larkin, N Kim, S Patel, S Kingsberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoactive sexual desire disorderOrgasmPlaceboSexual desirePostmenopausal womenPsychologyFemale sexual dysfunctionClinical psychologySexual dysfunctionArousalMedicinePsychiatryInternal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction Flibanserin, a treatment for acquired, generalized hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD), is approved in the US for use in certain premenopausal women and in Canada for use in both premenopausal and naturally postmenopausal women ≤60 years of age. Improvement in symptoms following initiation of flibanserin may take several weeks to emerge and it is important to set realistic expectations of treatment onset. Objective The primary objective of this analysis was to evaluate the onset of flibanserin's treatment effect in naturally postmenopausal women with HSDD across the 6 subdomains of the FSFI. Methods A post-hoc analysis was conducted using FSFI data from a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of flibanserin in naturally postmenopausal women with HSDD that included 895 postmenopausal women (flibanserin, n=432; placebo, n=463) who had at least one on-treatment efficacy assessment. The FSFI is a validated, 19-item self-report questionnaire comprising 6 subdomains of sexual functioning: desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. Each subdomain has a maximum score of 6 and higher scores indicate better sexual functioning. For each subdomain, change from baseline at each assessment visit (4, 8, 16, and 24 weeks) was calculated as the least squares mean difference. Comparisons between flibanserin and placebo groups were performed using analysis of covariance. Results Postmenopausal patients treated with flibanserin had significantly greater sexual desire and arousal scores than those treated with placebo at Week 4 and at every assessment timepoint thereafter (see figure). By Week 8, patients in the flibanserin group had significantly higher scores for all FSFI subdomains compared to the placebo group. This treatment effect was maintained at Week 24 for all subdomains except for pain. Conclusions Results from this post-hoc analysis indicates that postmenopausal women treated with flibanserin experienced improved sexual function compared to those treated with placebo with regard to sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm and satisfaction. This improvement was maintained over the entire course of treatment. These findings are consistent with those from a previous FSFI post-hoc analysis of clinical trial data from premenopausal women and suggest that flibanserin treatment of postmenopausal women was associated with improvement of multiple aspects of sexual function in addition to sexual desire. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Sprout Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Clarification Industry initiated, executed and funded study Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Sprout Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207