Anomaly detection of complex magnetic measurements using structured Hankel low-rank modeling and singular value decomposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The magnetic anomalies generated by the ferromagnetic targets are usually buried within uncontrollable interference sources, such as the power frequency and random noises. In particular, the variability of the geomagnetic field and the low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the magnetic anomalies cannot be avoided. In this paper, to improve the performance of magnetic anomaly detection (MAD) with a low SNR, we propose a novel structured low-rank (SLR) decomposition-based MAD method. In addition, a new framework based on the SLR and singular value decomposition (SVD) is constructed, dubbed SLR-SVD, and the corresponding working principle and implemented strategy are elaborated. Through comparing the SLR-SVD with two state-of-the-art methods, including principal component analysis and SVD, the results demonstrate that the proposed SLR-SVD can not only suppress the noise sufficiently, i.e., improving 55.26% approximately of the SNR, but also retain more boundary information of magnetic anomalies, i.e., decreasing approximately 68.05% of the mean squared error and improving approximately 28.47% of the structural similarity index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".